A clinical trial of cranial electrotherapy stimulation for anxiety and comorbid depression
Read the paperWhat they asked
Anxiety very often comes with low mood, and the combination is harder to treat than either alone. Timothy and Raymond Barclay, working in private practice in the United States, ran a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to ask a simple question: over five weeks of daily use, does an active Alpha-Stim reduce anxiety and depression more than an identical-looking device that delivers no current?
Who took part
One hundred and fifteen adults with a primary anxiety disorder and depressive symptoms, recruited from a private practice population. 108 completed the trial. The active and sham groups started with similar anxiety and depression scores.
What they did
Everyone took home a device and used it with ear clips for 60 minutes a day for five weeks. Active devices delivered 100 microamps, below the level most people can feel. Sham devices looked and worked the same but delivered no current, and neither participants nor the clinicians scoring them knew which was which. Anxiety and depression were rated by clinicians on the Hamilton scales at the start and the end.
What they found
Anxiety scores fell by about 55 per cent with the active device against about 27 per cent with sham. Depression scores fell by about 55 per cent against about 24 per cent. Both differences were statistically significant and the effect on anxiety was large. Around 83 per cent of the active group had at least halved their anxiety score. No side effects were reported. The sham group also improved a good deal, which is common in anxiety trials.
Why it might work
The gentle current is thought to nudge brain activity towards slower, calmer alpha rhythms. A daily hour of sitting quietly may also help, which is what the sham group controls for. The gap between active and sham is what makes this trial notable.
Limits
A single site, run by the two clinicians who wrote it up, with no trial registration reported. Outcomes were measured only at five weeks, so we do not know how long benefits lasted. The effects are larger than most later and more independent trials have found. The authors reported no funding and no conflicts of interest.







